Those Pesky Things Called Elections
I’ve said it before, elections are one of those things that have consequences. But I’m not the only one who has said that. Over the course of the last four years, the Lib-crats have pontificated that 2006 has been about the “mandate of the people”. And with that power, boy howdy did they ever run with it:
So today, Nancy goes in and says, “elections should not matter as much as they do” to a group at Tufts University this week. She certainly wasn’t thinking that way in November 2006 when she gave that self-congratulatory speech, now was she?
But now, with the Tea Party firmly tearing through the Washington establishment, Nancy is missing those good ol’ days when people didn’t stand on beliefs – they just stood on what special interest would fund them at the time.
Elections are supposed to matter a lot because if people don’t like the direction of their government, they should have the power to change it. November 2010 demonstrated that, after four years of change promises made by lib-crats, which only made the problem worse by failing to pass a budget – instead, spending every waking hour pushing the socialistic Health Deform bill.
By the way, Nancy, while you may call Republicans your friends, I scarcely can think of a Republican who would openly call you their friend. You represent government that no one really wants – at best a necessary evil, at worst an intolerable one. And you’ve never been the best at anything, except for caricatures.
In closing, I give you this insta-classic video to play over and over until either you get tired of it or Nancy gets actually voted out of the House…or your computer crashes.
Leave a Reply