The Rabid Conservative

Think Right, Act Right, Be Right.

Occupy + Peaceably Assemble = Epic Fail

with 7 comments


The OWS drones are still at it, unfortunately.  They continue to carry on the belief that they represent the people, the 99%.  And the Main Stream Media continuously ignores the fact that they are doing what they blamed the Tea Party from doing.  The MSM (except for FoxNews) continuously painted the Tea Party as a bunch of racist hatemongers, rioting and protesting with hate rhetoric.  Yet, we continue to see over and over that the OWS crowd is doing the things that they attempt to apply to the Tea Party and guess what, the MSM glosses over it.

But out here on the very biased right-wing Rabid Conservative. we won’t let it pass.  Whether it be protesters selling crack cocaine, having sex in the bushes, pushing old ladies to the pavement and sending them to the hospital, or, as seen in the photos below, defacing public and private property, whatever OWS is preaching gets drowned out in the walk-the-walk rhetoric of how they are acting.   I still challenge anyone to provide any evidence that these kinds of things happened at any Tea Party rally.

The one good thing of all of this is that OWS, who probably worships Obama as the High Pontiff of Entitlement, will probably be one of the lib-crats greatest liabilities.  I can’t waif for November 2012.

Photos from Michelle Malkin and scoop by JJ’s “Nose”. 😉

Wells Fargo under Assault

Chase Bank sees the same damage

Bank of America too

Whole Foods tells patrons to leave their signs outside, so that’s exactly what OWS did.

More defacement

More Vandalism

Still believe OWS is like the Tea Party?

Police brutality?  Some would call that Code Enforcement.

Defacement

Instead of Occupy Everything, their motto should be Deface Everything

And more

The Tea Party actually loves the police.  OWS, on the other hand, has a different view.  Love the Polaroid, by the way.

FTP??

Oakland Blockade – I guess these chaps didn’t make the cut for the Oakland Raiders front line, so they’re doing this now.

Oakland Blockade

The opposite of Capitalism, folks, is socialism.  So, if these people hate capitalism, what does that make them?

And where there is socialism, communism is soon to follow.  Perhaps the lib-crats should be the “red” and the GOP goes “blue”, might be more fitting that way.

Wage slavery indeed – it’s called a paycheck you idiots, provided for hard work and contribution, something commies know very little about.

War, racism, and poverty – because Communism worked so very well in the USSR, right?

And let’s not leave out the union hacks putting in their 2¢…

Jimmy Hoffa would be so proud, right?

Teaching kids to be good little socialists – an atrocity in it’s own right; these kids have no clue what this is about – not much different than the mindless drones holding their hands.  But aren’t they so cute??

Cop-hating Rapper Boots Riley adding more “class” to this “act” with his hit, “5 Million Ways to Kill a CEO”.  Of course, it looks like to me Riley is taking a gander at the girl’s backside – another rapper favorite pastime. (Sir Mix-a-Lot would be proud),

Advertisements

Written by The Rabid Conservative

November 8, 2011 at 3:00 pm

7 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. This was written by a 21 yr old female who gets it. It’s her future she’s worried about and this is how she feels about the social welfare big government state that she’s being forced to live in! These solutions are just common sense in her opinion.

    This was in the Waco Tribune Herald, Waco , TX Nov 18, 2010

    Put me in charge . . .

    Put me in charge of food stamps. I’d get rid of Lone Star cards; no cash for Ding Dongs or Ho Ho’s, just money for 50-pound bags of rice and beans, blocks of cheese and all the powdered milk you can haul away. If you want steak and frozen pizza, then get a job.

    Put me in charge of Medicaid. The first thing I’d do is to get women Norplant birth control implants or tubal ligations. Then, we’ll test recipients for drugs, alcohol, and nicotine and document all tattoos and piercings. If you want to reproduce or use drugs, alcohol, smoke or get tats and piercings, then get a job.

    Put me in charge of government housing. Ever live in a military barracks?

    You will maintain our property in a clean and good state of repair. Your “home” will be subject to inspections anytime and possessions will be inventoried. If you want a plasma TV or Xbox 360, then get a job and your own place.

    In addition, you will either present a check stub from a job each week or you will report to a “government” job. It may be cleaning the roadways of trash, painting and repairing public housing, whatever we find for you. We will sell your 22 inch rims and low profile tires and your blasting stereo and speakers and put that money toward the “common good..”

    Before you write that I’ve violated someone’s rights, realize that all of the above is voluntary. If you want our money, accept our rules.. Before you say that this would be “demeaning” and ruin their “self esteem,” consider that it wasn’t that long ago that taking someone else’s money for doing absolutely nothing was demeaning and lowered self esteem.

    If we are expected to pay for other people’s mistakes we should at least attempt to make them learn from their bad choices. The current system rewards them for continuing to make bad choices.

    AND While you are on Gov’t subsistence, you no longer can VOTE! Yes that is correct. For you to vote would be a conflict of interest. You will voluntarily remove yourself from voting while you are receiving a Gov’t welfare check. If you want to vote, then get a job.

    Joanie

    November 9, 2011 at 4:05 pm

    • Welcome to The Rabid Conservative! Great post!

      I’ve heard the idea of tying voting rights to government sustenance and that’s the way the Founders had it set up – if you weren’t a white. male land owner, you had no voting privilege because you the ward of someone else. While I am glad we did away with the requirements centered around the amount of melanin content one has in his/her skin or physiological arrangements, I think we lost something when we allowed those who don’t own land to vote. While land ownership may be a bit extreme, I think it’s right if those on government subsistence to be precluded from voting eligibility. We preclude felons from voting because they have wronged the citizens in many states until they have paid their sentence. (I advocate for voting for felons only after they have served their time and are no longer on parole and supervised release/probation).

      I bet the country would be a very different place if we precluded voting to those who aren’t on government welfare and other types of entitlements.

      Rick

      November 10, 2011 at 3:59 pm

      • I agree that ex-offenders should be able to have full rights once they’ve “paid their dues.” As for land ownership, I think that being “of this land” would be a nice addition 🙂

        Joanie

        November 10, 2011 at 7:52 pm

  2. Stolen from an email: The folks who are getting the free stuff don’t like the folks who are paying
    for the free stuff, because the folks who are paying for the free stuff can
    no longer afford to pay for both the free stuff and their own stuff.

    And, the folks who are paying for the free stuff want the free stuff to
    stop.

    And the folks who are getting the free stuff want even more free stuff on
    top of the free stuff they are already getting!

    Now…. the people who are forcing the people who pay for the free stuff
    have told the people who are RECEIVING the free stuff that the people who
    are PAYING for the free stuff are being mean, prejudiced, and racist.

    So…. the people who are GETTING the free stuff have been convinced they
    need to hate the people who are paying for the free stuff by the people who
    are forcing some people to pay for their free stuff and giving them the free
    stuff in the first place.

    We have let the free stuff giving go on for so long that there are now more
    people getting free stuff than paying for the free stuff.

    Now understand this. All great democracies have committed financial suicide
    somewhere between 200 and 250 years after being founded. The reason?

    The voters figured out they could vote themselves money from the treasury by
    electing people who promised to give them money from the treasury in
    exchange for electing them.

    The United States officially became a Republic in 1776, 231 years ago. The
    number of people now getting free stuff outnumbers the people paying for the
    free stuff. We have one chance to change that in 2012. Failure to change
    that spells the end of the United States as we know it.

    ELECTION 2012 IS COMING

    Language: English only

    Culture: Constitution, and the Bill of Rights!

    Drug Free: Mandatory Drug Screening before Welfare!

    NO freebies to: Non-Citizens!

    Joanie

    November 9, 2011 at 7:09 pm

    • The way I see it, this is illustrated in why liberals flock to major cities – close to the government spigots. It’s probably no surprise that flyover country and places away from the entitlements is also areas that show up red on the political map. The Declaration of Independence, a document sorely ignored by progressocialists and lib-crats says that people have the right to the PURSUIT of happiness, not the right to happiness.

      When people start tampering with “rights”, they put the government on the hook to provide those things, which is why the libs want to establish the right to health care and the right to housing and the right to this-or-that. People have no entitlement to health care, housing, or whatever. Instead, they have the freedom opportunity to go get these things, comparing to other societies that had no opportunity to earn a tract of land out of their own labor.

      Entitlement is a function of well-placed work, effort, and intelligence. Rights are bestowed by the Creator. Rights and entitlements are not the same thing, despite the libs attempts to make them that way. If Alice works harder than Bob, she should get more. If Alice is smarter than Bob, than Bob will have to work harder to get to the same level as Alice. That’s the way of things. Liberals don’t like that. But then, that’s why liberals advocate not keeping score at kiddie sport games – they teach that “they are all winners”. Sometimes, people need to lose to change so they can win.

      Besides, I would rather earn my temporal victories through my own blood, sweat, and tears than to have someone give them to me in exchange for their allegiance and loyalty.

      Rick

      November 10, 2011 at 3:48 pm

  3. HOW do we get this idea into the heads of the MASSES? “Entitlement is a function of well-placed work, effort, and intelligence. Rights are bestowed by the Creator. Rights and entitlements are not the same thing, despite the libs attempts to make them that way”

    I especially can’t get over the 21 year olds thought: “Before you say that this would be ‘demeaning’ and ruin their ‘self esteem,’ consider that it wasn’t that long ago that taking someone else’s money for doing absolutely nothing was demeaning and lowered self esteem.”

    Joanie

    November 10, 2011 at 7:58 pm

  4. […] Duff’s Latest Epic Fail: Trying To Depict Britain To Be Controlled By The Joos…..Occupy + Peaceably Assemble = Epic Fail ul.legalfooter li{ list-style:none; float:left; padding-right:20px; } .accept{ […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: